Across recent research and practitioner guidance, a consistent theme emerges: AI is most productive when it automates the routine so you can focus on the human. In practical terms, AI can meaningfully reduce the time you spend on repetitive, well-defined tasks. What it cannot, and should not, replace is the

The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (or GenAI) is present in all teaching modalities and levels. Tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, CoPilot, and Grammarly are embedded into our everyday software and everyday lives. The same can be said for our students, who have been making decisions about when, how, and why

2025 brought even more urgency to finding an answer to the question, “What is the role of educators when it comes to AI?” In early 2025, students recognized AI was generating uncertainty around future job prospects and noted a lack of formal AI integration into their studies.1 (Risepoint, 2025). As

AI-empowered research is reshaping the way we summarize, interpret, and discover knowledge. Faculty and students can now look to AI to potentially accelerate literature reviews and identify new hypotheses1 (Bolaños, Salatino, Osborne, & Motta, 2024). Decades ago, scholars visited their university library, with its grand bookshelves of knowledge and calming space filled with