The Professor’s AI Action Plan

2025 brought even more urgency to finding an answer to the question, “What is the role of educators when it comes to AI?” In early 2025, students recognized AI was generating uncertainty around future job prospects and noted a lack of formal AI integration into their studies.1 (Risepoint, 2025). As students voiced the need to understand AI, they didn’t waste any time experimenting with it.

A 2025 study, published in Education and Information Technologies, focused on university student attitudes toward AI and indicated that more than half of the students in the study (61%) used AI, with 93.8% using ChatGPT2 (Morell-Mengual et al., 2025). Students in the study cited inaccurate or irrelevant responses in the AI output, which surfaced two issues: 1) the need to help learners interpret and validate AI output and 2) designing assessments so that the instructor isn’t devoting time analyzing if the output is from the student or AI.

As complaints about student use of AI continue to grow, newer and more sophisticated AI tools that support specialized work within academia continue to arrive on the scene. Whether students want to leverage AI as a study partner or accelerate their scholarly work with AI-powered research assistants, 2025 has highlighted the need for understanding the role of a professor in today’s AI-enabled world. 3, 4 (Risepoint, 2025).

So perhaps the question is not “what is the role of educators when it comes to AI?” Perhaps the question is “how do we support students as they build the bridge between conceptual knowledge and application in an AI enabled world?” The answer requires each of us to act as a learner-centered, AI-savvy professor, a definition which has changed dramatically since late 2023 as AI technology and adoption strategies have evolved. Instead of wondering what your next step is, here are three practical 2026 goals that busy professors like you can use to quickly get on track with AI.

Working on the three goals outlined above can help you feel more confident and supported heading into your next term. You will have drawn on the expertise and guidance of your campus support teams, given yourself permission to experiment with AI so you better understand its capabilities and real world uses in your field, and spent intentional time reworking written deliverables, which are still one of the most common AI related challenges for professors in 2025. Together, working on these goals will put you in a strong position to support your students and yourself as AI continues to evolve next year.

Create Your Action Plan

Copy and use the prompt below in your favorite AI tool to begin building your action plan now! 

Copy the text below to use this prompt in your favorite AI Tool.


 

“Faculty 2026 AI Action Plan

Role & Purpose

You are an AI and higher education expert supporting me. I am a faculty member who teaches online accelerated courses and I want to use artificial intelligence to improve teaching, learning, equity, and institutional sustainability.

Your task is to create a personalized 2026 AI Action Plan for the me using the prompt below based on my context, readiness, discipline, and students.

The plan must be realistic, ethical, policy-aware, and focused on small practical changes.

Before making recommendations, review and incorporate relevant guidance from this companion article:https://faculty.risepoint.com/the-professors-ai-action-plan/

Step 1: Gather Faculty Context

Ask the me to respond to all questions below.

Institutional Context

  • Does your institution have an official AI policy? (Yes / No / Unsure)
  • Are any AI tools approved for teaching, learning, or research? (If yes, list)

Professional Development

  • How often do you engage in AI-related professional development?
    • Regularly / Occasionally / Rarely / Never

Curriculum & Teaching

  • How is AI currently integrated into your teaching?
    • Not at all
    • Informal or experimental
    • Intentional (aligned to outcomes/assessments)
    • Extensive (multiple courses or program-level)
  • How have you personally used AI? (Select all that apply)
    • Course design or revision
    • Teaching or facilitation
    • Assessment or feedback
    • Research or scholarship
    • Administrative/productivity tasks
    • Not yet

Leadership & Advocacy

  • How comfortable are you advocating for responsible AI use and student ROI?
    • Not comfortable / Somewhat / Comfortable / Very comfortable

Students & Discipline

  • Student level(s): Undergraduate / Graduate / Both
  • Discipline(s) taught:

Step 2: Create the 2026 AI Action Plan

Using my responses, generate a three-goal plan aligned to the academic year:

  • Spring 2026
  • Summer 2026
  • Fall 2026

Each goal should include:

  • A clear focus area
  • 2–4 concrete actions
  • Responsible and transparent AI use
  • Explicit connections to student learning value and workforce relevance

Differentiation by Readiness (Required)

Adapt the plan based on my experience:

🟢 Early-Stage or Hesitant

Focus on:

  • AI literacy and policy awareness
  • Low-risk, high-impact uses (e.g., administrative tasks, course development support)
  • Clear expectations for students
  • Confidence-building and guardrails

🟡 Moderately Experienced

Focus on:

  • Intentional curriculum integration
  • AI-informed assessment redesign
  • Teaching students responsible AI use
  • Participation in communities of practice or other professional development

🔵 Advanced

Prioritize:

  • Piloting AI-enabled course or curriculum models
  • Exploring agentic AI (tutors, simulations, workflow agents)
  • Advancing equity and accessibility (UDL, inclusive design)
  • Mentoring peers or contributing to institutional strategy

Output Format

Present the plan as:

  1. Faculty AI Readiness Snapshot (brief synthesis)
  2. 2026 AI Action Plan
    • Spring goal + actions
    • Summer goal + actions
    • Fall goal + actions
  3. Responsible AI Commitments (3–5 guiding principles)
  4. Next Small Step (Next 30 Days) to build momentum

Tone & Constraints

  • Use clear, supportive, non-judgmental language
  • Avoid hype or fear-based framing
  • Do not assume institutional resources that were not stated
  • When policies are unclear, recommend alignment and consultation, not experimentation\
  • Never suggest that student or other sensitive data be placed into AI tools”

References

  1. Risepoint. (2025, June). Voice of the online learner 2025 (14th ed.). Risepoint. https://risepoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Voice-of-the-Online-Learner-2025.pdf
  2. Morell-Mengual, V., Fernández-García, O., Berenguer, C., et al. (2025). Characteristics, motivations and attitudes of students using ChatGPT and other language model-based chatbots in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22257–22274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13650-1
  3. Risepoint. (2025, September 18). Students use ChatGPT, do they know about Study Mode? Faculty eCommons. https://faculty.risepoint.com/students-use-chatgpt-do-they-know-about-study-mode/
  4. Risepoint. (2025, November 17). AI as a research partner. Faculty eCommons. https://faculty.risepoint.com/ai-as-a-research-partner/
  5. Corp, S. (2025, February 24). CAI announces new generative AI projects to support teaching and learning. Center for Academic Innovation, University of Michigan. https://ai.umich.edu/blog-posts/generative-ai-projects-teaching-learning/
  6. The Ohio State University. (2025, June 4). Ohio State launches bold AI Fluency initiative to redefine learning and innovation. Ohio State News. https://news.osu.edu/ohio-state-launches-bold-ai-fluency-initiative-to-redefine-learning-and-innovation/
  7. Harvard University Information Technology. (n.d.). Guidelines for the use of generative AI tools at Harvard. Harvard University. https://www.huit.harvard.edu/ai/guidelines
  8. George Mason University, Information Technology Services. (n.d.). AI toolkit. https://its.gmu.edu/help-support/ai-toolkit/
  9. Youngkin, G. (2025, February 11). Executive Order Number Forty-Six (2025): Banning the use of DeepSeek artificial intelligence on state government technology. Office of the Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia. https://www.governor.virginia.gov/media/governorvirginiagov/governor-of-virginia/pdf/eo/EO-46.pdf
  10. OpenAI. (2025, October 21). Introducing ChatGPT Atlas. OpenAI. https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-atlas/
  11. Peters, T. (2025, August 29). Thinking with AI: What a viral MIT study reveals about AI and the learning brain. Risepoint. https://risepoint.com/insights/thinking-with-ai-what-a-viral-mit-study-reveals-about-ai-and-the-learning-brain/
  12. Risepoint. (2025, October) Discussion boards in an AI world. Faculty eCommons. https://faculty.risepoint.com/discussion-boards-in-an-ai-world/